A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between future neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has progressed right into a very publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, look for to build their family home. The situation is now emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result locations are subject matter to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which can be partly built, is in the correct place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, in which views of the sea are both extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being meant to Collect Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the water all through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute from the authorized timeline.
For the core on the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each stressed that their motion is determined by problem for environmental protection and adherence to planning regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A personal watch, insisting as a substitute that it is about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have got described their very long-standing connection to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few merely trying to produce a loved ones dwelling in accordance With all the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Particular Place of Conservation and say that all functions are performed according to Specialist information and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean all through a storm, don't change the fundamental details.
The case has also raised broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal website happens to be a shorthand description for just a circumstance a large number of observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times article about René Collier observed the businessman had Earlier been associated with nearby advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket must figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with setting up permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Distinctive Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging situations. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay along with one another extensive following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction is effective at the internet site on Dublin Paul Feely and René Collier Street, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential issues such as environmental defense and property legal rights are perceived to get at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter if it will eventually be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.